<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: In re Application of High Point  SARL	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/23/case-of-the-day-in-re-application-of-high-point-sarl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/23/case-of-the-day-in-re-application-of-high-point-sarl/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:24:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Foster v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/23/case-of-the-day-in-re-application-of-high-point-sarl/#comment-24158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Foster v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1476#comment-24158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] question? My view is that federal law, not state law governs (see the discussion in the post on  In re Application of High Point, the case of the day from June 23, 2011). Nevertheless, there isn&#8217;t a lot of federal common [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] question? My view is that federal law, not state law governs (see the discussion in the post on  In re Application of High Point, the case of the day from June 23, 2011). Nevertheless, there isn&#8217;t a lot of federal common [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Moore v. Lowe&#039;s Companies &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/23/case-of-the-day-in-re-application-of-high-point-sarl/#comment-23223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Moore v. Lowe&#039;s Companies &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2024 03:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1476#comment-23223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] law, only turning to Kentucky law at the end of the opinion, to amplify his decision. I have previously opined that federal law does indeed govern, though as I have noted, there is not an enormous amount of [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] law, only turning to Kentucky law at the end of the opinion, to amplify his decision. I have previously opined that federal law does indeed govern, though as I have noted, there is not an enormous amount of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
