<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Scheck v. Republic of Argentina	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Scheck v. Republic of Argentina revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-24153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Scheck v. Republic of Argentina revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-24153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the case of the day from June 6, 2011, Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, the district court rejected a challenge by Argentina to service of process in an action to enforce [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the case of the day from June 6, 2011, Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, the district court rejected a challenge by Argentina to service of process in an action to enforce [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-24103</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 02:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-24103</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] such a declaration. So under Article 15(2), the US court is free to enter a default judgment. As in Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, another sovereign debt case, the foreign central authority probably would have been better off [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] such a declaration. So under Article 15(2), the US court is free to enter a default judgment. As in Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, another sovereign debt case, the foreign central authority probably would have been better off [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Bleier v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] such a declaration. So under Article 15(2), the US court is free to enter a default judgment. As in Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, another sovereign debt case, the foreign central authority probably would have been better off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] such a declaration. So under Article 15(2), the US court is free to enter a default judgment. As in Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, another sovereign debt case, the foreign central authority probably would have been better off [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Scheck v. Republic of Argentina revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Scheck v. Republic of Argentina revisited &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] on September 16, 2011 in FSIA, Recognition and EnforcementIn the case of the day from June 6, 2011, Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, the district court rejected a challenge by Argentina to service of process in an action to enforce [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on September 16, 2011 in FSIA, Recognition and EnforcementIn the case of the day from June 6, 2011, Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, the district court rejected a challenge by Argentina to service of process in an action to enforce [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the award; and Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, rejecting Argentina&#8217;s defense of insufficient service of process in an action for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the award; and Scheck v. Republic of Argentina, rejecting Argentina&#8217;s defense of insufficient service of process in an action for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/06/06/case-of-the-day-scheck-v-republic-of-argentina/#comment-167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1388#comment-167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian decision in the Altain Khuder case, the case of the German investors in Argentine bonds seeking recognition and enforcement of their judgments against Argentina in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian decision in the Altain Khuder case, the case of the German investors in Argentine bonds seeking recognition and enforcement of their judgments against Argentina in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
