<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Motions to &#8220;Validate&#8221; Questionable Service Of Process	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:15:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day XCentric Ventures, LLC v. Karsen, Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/#comment-24161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day XCentric Ventures, LLC v. Karsen, Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1343#comment-24161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] ex parte motion to approve its efforts to serve process on the defendants. As I have previously commented, I question whether these kinds of motions are justiciable—why should the court give what is [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ex parte motion to approve its efforts to serve process on the defendants. As I have previously commented, I question whether these kinds of motions are justiciable—why should the court give what is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kowalski v. Anova Food, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/#comment-23293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kowalski v. Anova Food, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 03:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1343#comment-23293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] retroactively &#8220;validate&#8221; Kowalski&#8217;s faulty attempts to serve process (I&#8217;ve written about this issue before). But the court also refused to allow Kowalski&#8217;s motion for leave to make alternative [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] retroactively &#8220;validate&#8221; Kowalski&#8217;s faulty attempts to serve process (I&#8217;ve written about this issue before). But the court also refused to allow Kowalski&#8217;s motion for leave to make alternative [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kowalski v. Anova Food, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/#comment-160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kowalski v. Anova Food, LLC &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1343#comment-160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] retroactively &#8220;validate&#8221; Kowalski&#8217;s faulty attempts to serve process (I&#8217;ve written about this issue before). But the court also refused to allow Kowalski&#8217;s motion for leave to make alternative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] retroactively &#8220;validate&#8221; Kowalski&#8217;s faulty attempts to serve process (I&#8217;ve written about this issue before). But the court also refused to allow Kowalski&#8217;s motion for leave to make alternative [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day XCentric Ventures, LLC v. Karsen, Ltd. &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/25/motions-to-validate-questionable-service-of-process/#comment-159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day XCentric Ventures, LLC v. Karsen, Ltd. &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1343#comment-159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] ex parte motion to approve its efforts to serve process on the defendants. As I have previously commented, I question whether these kinds of motions are justiciable—why should the court give what is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] ex parte motion to approve its efforts to serve process on the defendants. As I have previously commented, I question whether these kinds of motions are justiciable—why should the court give what is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
