Comments on: Case of the Day: CTB v. Twitter, Inc. https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/23/case-of-the-day-ctb-v-twitter-inc/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:26:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: In re Request for Judicial Assistance From the Norrköping District Court | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/23/case-of-the-day-ctb-v-twitter-inc/#comment-22760 Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:50:09 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1301#comment-22760 […] can apply here, so does the judge really have discretion to refuse to grant the request? I’ve suggested before that in light of Article 12 the answer should be no. It seems to me that subject to constitutional […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: Bower v. Bower | Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/23/case-of-the-day-ctb-v-twitter-inc/#comment-157 Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:05:00 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1301#comment-157 […] of the emails. We have seen the Stored Communications Act before, notably in the discussion of CTB v. Twitter, the case of the day from May 23, 2011, and In re Toft, the case of the day from August 1, 2011. […]

]]> By: Case of the Day: In re Application for Appointment of Commissioner « Letters Blogatory https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/23/case-of-the-day-ctb-v-twitter-inc/#comment-156 Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:12:20 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1301#comment-156 […] and that the Intel factors favored issuance of the subpoena. As we noted in the discussion of CTB v. Twitter, the Stored Communications Act does not protect user identities or other non-content information. […]

]]>