Comments on: Case of the Day: Linsen International Ltd. v. Humpuss Sea Transport https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/20/case-of-the-day-linsen-international-ltd-v-humpuss-sea-transport/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:26:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Peter https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/20/case-of-the-day-linsen-international-ltd-v-humpuss-sea-transport/#comment-155 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:48:33 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1272#comment-155 I agree. Fn.2 shows that the judge was thoughtful enough to find a copy of the arbitration agreement in a prior filing. Some judges, particularly outside of the U.S., would just use that as an excuse to dismiss.

]]> By: Ted Folkman https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/20/case-of-the-day-linsen-international-ltd-v-humpuss-sea-transport/#comment-154 Mon, 04 Jul 2011 21:38:56 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1272#comment-154 In reply to Peter.

I agree, Peter. This was an easy case, though. Given HST’s failure to give the court any reason to refuse recognition, the court could hardly have decided in HST’s favor!

]]> By: Peter https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/20/case-of-the-day-linsen-international-ltd-v-humpuss-sea-transport/#comment-153 Mon, 04 Jul 2011 09:04:51 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1272#comment-153 Excellent decision. The S.D.N.Y. once again confirms its pro-arbitration policy and refuses to pay attention to formalism and technicalities.

]]>