<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Mitchell v. Volkswagen Group of America	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/17/case-of-the-day-mitchell-v-volkswagen-group-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/17/case-of-the-day-mitchell-v-volkswagen-group-of-america/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Update on the Hague Service Convention In Mexico &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/17/case-of-the-day-mitchell-v-volkswagen-group-of-america/#comment-151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update on the Hague Service Convention In Mexico &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 01:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1237#comment-151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] by mail. The English translation of Mexico&#8217;s older declarations was ambiguous, as we saw in the discussion of Mitchell v. Volkswagen, but the new declaration leaves no room for doubt: &#8221; In accordance with Article 21, second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] by mail. The English translation of Mexico&#8217;s older declarations was ambiguous, as we saw in the discussion of Mitchell v. Volkswagen, but the new declaration leaves no room for doubt: &#8221; In accordance with Article 21, second [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Barnett v. Miguel &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/17/case-of-the-day-mitchell-v-volkswagen-group-of-america/#comment-150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Barnett v. Miguel &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1237#comment-150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] that service by mail in Mexico is impermissible under the Convention, as discussed in the post on Mitchell v. Volkswagen. The plaintiffs also transmitted the papers to the Mexican central authority, but because the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that service by mail in Mexico is impermissible under the Convention, as discussed in the post on Mitchell v. Volkswagen. The plaintiffs also transmitted the papers to the Mexican central authority, but because the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
