<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Drafting for Service of Process Problems	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/10/drafting-for-service-of-process-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/10/drafting-for-service-of-process-problems/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: New Jersey v. Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/10/drafting-for-service-of-process-problems/#comment-162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: New Jersey v. Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1126#comment-162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Cir. 2011). The case illustrates a trap for the unwary in drafting forum selection clauses. In an earlier post, I dealt with another aspect of these clauses, namely, appointment of an agent for service of [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Cir. 2011). The case illustrates a trap for the unwary in drafting forum selection clauses. In an earlier post, I dealt with another aspect of these clauses, namely, appointment of an agent for service of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: New Jersey v. Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/05/10/drafting-for-service-of-process-problems/#comment-161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: New Jersey v. Merrill Lynch &#38; Co. &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1126#comment-161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Cir. 2011). The case illustrates a trap for the unwary in drafting forum selection clauses. In an earlier post, I dealt with another aspect of these clauses, namely, appointment of an agent for service of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Cir. 2011). The case illustrates a trap for the unwary in drafting forum selection clauses. In an earlier post, I dealt with another aspect of these clauses, namely, appointment of an agent for service of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
