<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: AT&#038;T Mobility LLC v. Conception	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/29/case-of-the-day-att-mobility-llc-v-conception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/29/case-of-the-day-att-mobility-llc-v-conception/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Folkman		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/29/case-of-the-day-att-mobility-llc-v-conception/#comment-135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Folkman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=1114#comment-135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A couple of colleagues have questioned whether my characterization of the majority&#039;s view was correct, i.e., whether the majority really said, as I claimed, that class actions are incompatible with arbitration. I would therefore like to make a blatant appeal to authority. SCOTUSBlog has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/04/opinion-analysis-what-counts-as-arbitration-and-who-decides/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; up that takes the same line:
&lt;blockquote&gt;It is therefore difficult to avoid the conclusion that, at bottom, the majority struck down the Discover Bank rule under the FAA because class arbitration is inconsistent with its substantive conception of what arbitration should be. &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of colleagues have questioned whether my characterization of the majority&#8217;s view was correct, i.e., whether the majority really said, as I claimed, that class actions are incompatible with arbitration. I would therefore like to make a blatant appeal to authority. SCOTUSBlog has an <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2011/04/opinion-analysis-what-counts-as-arbitration-and-who-decides/" rel="nofollow ugc">analysis</a> up that takes the same line:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is therefore difficult to avoid the conclusion that, at bottom, the majority struck down the Discover Bank rule under the FAA because class arbitration is inconsistent with its substantive conception of what arbitration should be. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
