<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Peiker Acustic, Inc. v. Kennedy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/14/case-of-the-day-peiker-acustic-inc-v-kennedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/14/case-of-the-day-peiker-acustic-inc-v-kennedy/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:25:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: RECARO North America v. Holmbergs Childsafety Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/14/case-of-the-day-peiker-acustic-inc-v-kennedy/#comment-130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: RECARO North America v. Holmbergs Childsafety Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=961#comment-130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] think the court&#8217;s view on this was yet another example of the courts&#8217; reluctance to let foreign parties use the Hague Evidence Convention unfairly. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] think the court&#8217;s view on this was yet another example of the courts&#8217; reluctance to let foreign parties use the Hague Evidence Convention unfairly. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: RECARO North America v. Holmbergs Childsafety Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/14/case-of-the-day-peiker-acustic-inc-v-kennedy/#comment-129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: RECARO North America v. Holmbergs Childsafety Co. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=961#comment-129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the plaintiff to pay the witnesses&#8217; travel costs.I think the court&#8217;s view on this was yet another example of the courts&#8217; reluctance to let foreign parties use the Hague Evidence Convention unfairly. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the plaintiff to pay the witnesses&#8217; travel costs.I think the court&#8217;s view on this was yet another example of the courts&#8217; reluctance to let foreign parties use the Hague Evidence Convention unfairly. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re SNP Boat Service SA &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/14/case-of-the-day-peiker-acustic-inc-v-kennedy/#comment-128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re SNP Boat Service SA &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=961#comment-128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] moral of the story is one we&#8217;ve seen before. If you come to the courts of the United States seeking their aid, think hard before you invoke [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] moral of the story is one we&#8217;ve seen before. If you come to the courts of the United States seeking their aid, think hard before you invoke [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
