<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Recognition of foreign judgments in defamation cases: the SPEECH Act	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 21:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the day: In re Gliner &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-42169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the day: In re Gliner &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-42169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] against granting a 1782 application in a foreign defamation case, especially in light of the SPEECH Act, the federal statute barring recognition of foreign defamation judgments when the foreign law does [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] against granting a 1782 application in a foreign defamation case, especially in light of the SPEECH Act, the federal statute barring recognition of foreign defamation judgments when the foreign law does [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sanchez v. Lord &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-24174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sanchez v. Lord &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-24174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] HT to Antonin I. Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. Lord (Mo. Ct. App. 2011), the first case of the day applying the SPEECH Act. Our previous coverage of the Act, which provides a rule of non-recognition for foreign defamation judgments that do not comply with U.S. constitutional law, is here. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] HT to Antonin I. Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. Lord (Mo. Ct. App. 2011), the first case of the day applying the SPEECH Act. Our previous coverage of the Act, which provides a rule of non-recognition for foreign defamation judgments that do not comply with U.S. constitutional law, is here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Trout Point Lodge v. Handshoe &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-22873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Trout Point Lodge v. Handshoe &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-22873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] federal appellate decision to focus on the SPEECH Act in a major way. Readers may want to refer to overview post of the Act. In short, the Act creates a rule against recognition of foreign defamation judgments if [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] federal appellate decision to focus on the SPEECH Act in a major way. Readers may want to refer to overview post of the Act. In short, the Act creates a rule against recognition of foreign defamation judgments if [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: United States v. Meta &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-8840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: United States v. Meta &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2023 23:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-8840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Act. Here is another question I&#8217;ve never seen addressed in practice. A federal statute, the SPEECH Act, forbids US courts from recognizing foreign defamation judgments when their defamation law is [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Act. Here is another question I&#8217;ve never seen addressed in practice. A federal statute, the SPEECH Act, forbids US courts from recognizing foreign defamation judgments when their defamation law is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Major Jurisdictional Decisions In Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Jurisdictional Decisions In Canada &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] if he prevails, will be unenforceable in the United States. Presumably this is on account of the SPEECH Act. I would go further and say that if the case were litigated in the United States in the first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] if he prevails, will be unenforceable in the United States. Presumably this is on account of the SPEECH Act. I would go further and say that if the case were litigated in the United States in the first [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Gianasso &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Gianasso &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] be looking for ways to argue that the public policy embodied in the SPEECH Act (which we discussed in April 2011) provides a discretionary basis for denying judicial assistance. The Act bars recognition of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be looking for ways to argue that the public policy embodied in the SPEECH Act (which we discussed in April 2011) provides a discretionary basis for denying judicial assistance. The Act bars recognition of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Legislation of the Day: Ecuador To Refuse To Enforce Spanish Mortgages &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legislation of the Day: Ecuador To Refuse To Enforce Spanish Mortgages &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] before the Ecuadoran parliament on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. I&#8217;ve written before about the SPEECH Act, the new US statute that forbids recognition and enforcement of foreign [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] before the Ecuadoran parliament on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. I&#8217;ve written before about the SPEECH Act, the new US statute that forbids recognition and enforcement of foreign [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group « Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-123</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: InvestorsHub.com v. Mina Mar Group « Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] an earlier post, we reviewed the main provisions of the Act, notably the provision allowing U.S. residents and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an earlier post, we reviewed the main provisions of the Act, notably the provision allowing U.S. residents and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] posts continue to attract significant attention long after they are published. These include the post on the SPEECH Act and recognition of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] posts continue to attract significant attention long after they are published. These include the post on the SPEECH Act and recognition of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Sanchez v. Lord &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/07/recognition-of-foreign-judgments-in-defamation-cases-the-speech-act/#comment-121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Sanchez v. Lord &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=869#comment-121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] HT to Antonin I. Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. Lord (Mo. Ct. App. 2011), the first case of the day applying the SPEECH Act. Our previous coverage of the Act, which provides a rule of non-recognition for foreign defamation judgments that do not comply with U.S. constitutional law, is here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] HT to Antonin I. Pribetic for his post on the case of the day, Sanchez v. Lord (Mo. Ct. App. 2011), the first case of the day applying the SPEECH Act. Our previous coverage of the Act, which provides a rule of non-recognition for foreign defamation judgments that do not comply with U.S. constitutional law, is here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
