<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Indus. Co. v. Robinson Helicopter Co.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chinese Court Recognizes US Commercial Money Judgment &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/#comment-115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chinese Court Recognizes US Commercial Money Judgment &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 00:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=770#comment-115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] doctrine of reciprocity should be applied to Liu’s JRE application. Liu has provided evidence of Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Industrial Co., Ltd et. al. v. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc., 2 where a U.S. court recognized and enforced a Chinese judgment. Therefore, reciprocity has been [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] doctrine of reciprocity should be applied to Liu’s JRE application. Liu has provided evidence of Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Industrial Co., Ltd et. al. v. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc., 2 where a U.S. court recognized and enforced a Chinese judgment. Therefore, reciprocity has been [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Minding The Gap &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/#comment-114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minding The Gap &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2018 22:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=770#comment-114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] of forum non conveniens and judgment enforcement, but it is part of a growing trend of &#8220;American lawyers outsmarting themselves&#8221; by seeking dismissal from U.S. courts in favor of a foreign forum, only to subsequently [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of forum non conveniens and judgment enforcement, but it is part of a growing trend of &#8220;American lawyers outsmarting themselves&#8221; by seeking dismissal from U.S. courts in favor of a foreign forum, only to subsequently [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Minding The Gap &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/#comment-113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minding The Gap &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=770#comment-113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] of forum non conveniens and judgment enforcement, but it is part of a growing trend of &#8220;American lawyers outsmarting themselves&#8221; by seeking dismissal from U.S. courts in favor of a foreign forum, only to subsequently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of forum non conveniens and judgment enforcement, but it is part of a growing trend of &#8220;American lawyers outsmarting themselves&#8221; by seeking dismissal from U.S. courts in favor of a foreign forum, only to subsequently [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Update on the Preparations for Work on a Judgments Convention &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/#comment-112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update on the Preparations for Work on a Judgments Convention &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=770#comment-112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] will tell.Notes:We covered the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s decision in the Hubei v. Robinson case back on April 1, 2011. &#8617;see Professor Whytock&#8217;s new paper, Transnational Judicial Governance, available at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] will tell.Notes:We covered the Ninth Circuit&#8217;s decision in the Hubei v. Robinson case back on April 1, 2011. &#8617;see Professor Whytock&#8217;s new paper, Transnational Judicial Governance, available at [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: US Courts For Chinese Litigants. The Year In Review. : China Law Blog : China Law for Business		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/04/01/hubei-robinson/#comment-111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[US Courts For Chinese Litigants. The Year In Review. : China Law Blog : China Law for Business]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=770#comment-111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] knows that US judgments are not readily enforceable in China, but the converse is not true, as Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Indus. Co. v. Robinson Helicopter Co., 425 Fed. Appx. 580 (9th Cir. 2011) shows. Hubei first sued Robinson in Los Angeles, but Robinson, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] knows that US judgments are not readily enforceable in China, but the converse is not true, as Hubei Gezhouba Sanlian Indus. Co. v. Robinson Helicopter Co., 425 Fed. Appx. 580 (9th Cir. 2011) shows. Hubei first sued Robinson in Los Angeles, but Robinson, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
