<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gustavo Lamelas on the Judicial Assistance Statute	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kaiser Group International v. World Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/#comment-24170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kaiser Group International v. World Bank &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=718#comment-24170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] the court still would have been right to deny the application, since, as I have noted before (e.g., here), I think the better reading of the judicial assistance statute does not extend to private [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the court still would have been right to deny the application, since, as I have noted before (e.g., here), I think the better reading of the judicial assistance statute does not extend to private [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Article of the Day: Beale, Lugar, and Schwarz on the Judicial Assistance Statute and Arbitration « Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/#comment-110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Article of the Day: Beale, Lugar, and Schwarz on the Judicial Assistance Statute and Arbitration « Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=718#comment-110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] approach outlined in Gustavo Lamelas’s recent article, which I reviewed here. That is, they would take the question on a case-by-case basis rather than adopting a categorical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] approach outlined in Gustavo Lamelas’s recent article, which I reviewed here. That is, they would take the question on a case-by-case basis rather than adopting a categorical [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Kaiser Group International v. World Bank &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/#comment-109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Kaiser Group International v. World Bank &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 11:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=718#comment-109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the court still would have been right to deny the application, since, as I have noted before (e.g., here), I think the better reading of the judicial assistance statute does not extend to private [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the court still would have been right to deny the application, since, as I have noted before (e.g., here), I think the better reading of the judicial assistance statute does not extend to private [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: New Features on Letters Blogatory &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/30/gustavo-lamelas-on-the-judicial-assistance-statute/#comment-108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Features on Letters Blogatory &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=718#comment-108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] unavoidably covering cases that, in my opinion, come out wrong. Two of the cases discussed in my review of Gustavo Lamelas&#8217;s recent article are cases in point. So what I am in the process of doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unavoidably covering cases that, in my opinion, come out wrong. Two of the cases discussed in my review of Gustavo Lamelas&#8217;s recent article are cases in point. So what I am in the process of doing [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
