<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: United Company Rusal v. Trafigura AG	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/28/case-of-the-day-united-company-rusal-v-trafigura-ag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/28/case-of-the-day-united-company-rusal-v-trafigura-ag/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Core VCT plc v. Hensley &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/28/case-of-the-day-united-company-rusal-v-trafigura-ag/#comment-22765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Core VCT plc v. Hensley &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=684#comment-22765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] E. Pfander and Daniel D. Birk on federal court jurisdiction in non-contentious cases. I&#8217;ve previously noted a concern about why the federal courts should have subject-matter jurisdiction of applications for [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] E. Pfander and Daniel D. Birk on federal court jurisdiction in non-contentious cases. I&#8217;ve previously noted a concern about why the federal courts should have subject-matter jurisdiction of applications for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The History of Judicial Assistance &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/28/case-of-the-day-united-company-rusal-v-trafigura-ag/#comment-105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The History of Judicial Assistance &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=684#comment-105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] while back I wrote about the United Company Rusal v. Trafigura case, the only case I know of with a really serious discussion of why the district courts have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] while back I wrote about the United Company Rusal v. Trafigura case, the only case I know of with a really serious discussion of why the district courts have [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
