<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Argentine Republic v. National Grid plc	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/16/case-of-the-day-argentine-republic-v-natl-grid-plc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/16/case-of-the-day-argentine-republic-v-natl-grid-plc/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:32:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/16/case-of-the-day-argentine-republic-v-natl-grid-plc/#comment-24165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=578#comment-24165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] on Argentina v. BG Group, confirming an award against Argentina under the Argentina/UK BIT; Argentine Republic v. National Grid plc, denying Argentina&#8217;s motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on Argentina v. BG Group, confirming an award against Argentina under the Argentina/UK BIT; Argentine Republic v. National Grid plc, denying Argentina&#8217;s motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Grupo Unidos Por El Canal v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/16/case-of-the-day-argentine-republic-v-natl-grid-plc/#comment-96</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Grupo Unidos Por El Canal v. Autoridad del Canal de Panama &#124; Letters Blogatory &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=578#comment-96</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] under the application convention with reasonable diligence. I considered a similar problem in a 2011 post, but the decision there didn&#8217;t reach a holding on the [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] under the application convention with reasonable diligence. I considered a similar problem in a 2011 post, but the decision there didn&#8217;t reach a holding on the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/16/case-of-the-day-argentine-republic-v-natl-grid-plc/#comment-95</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cases of the Day: NML Capital Ltd. v. Argentina &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=578#comment-95</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] on Argentina v. BG Group, confirming an award against Argentina under the Argentina/UK BIT; Argentine Republic v. National Grid plc, denying Argentina&#8217;s motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on Argentina v. BG Group, confirming an award against Argentina under the Argentina/UK BIT; Argentine Republic v. National Grid plc, denying Argentina&#8217;s motion to vacate another award on procedural grounds and confirming the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
