<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Samsun Logix Corp. v. Bank of China	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/15/case-of-the-day-samsun-logix-corp-v-bank-of-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/15/case-of-the-day-samsun-logix-corp-v-bank-of-china/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Swezey v. Merrill Lynch &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/15/case-of-the-day-samsun-logix-corp-v-bank-of-china/#comment-89</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Swezey v. Merrill Lynch &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=569#comment-89</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Merrill Lynch under Section 5225 of the New York Civil Procedure Law, the same statute at play in Samsun Logix Corp. v. Bank of China, the case of the day from March 15. The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court again [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Merrill Lynch under Section 5225 of the New York Civil Procedure Law, the same statute at play in Samsun Logix Corp. v. Bank of China, the case of the day from March 15. The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court again [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/03/15/case-of-the-day-samsun-logix-corp-v-bank-of-china/#comment-88</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=569#comment-88</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] bonds seeking recognition and enforcement of their judgments against Argentina in the US, and the New York case on enforcement of a foreign arbitral award by attachment of assets in New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] bonds seeking recognition and enforcement of their judgments against Argentina in the US, and the New York case on enforcement of a foreign arbitral award by attachment of assets in New [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
