https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/17/case-of-the-day-ingaseosas-international-v-aconcagua-investing/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:36:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/17/case-of-the-day-ingaseosas-international-v-aconcagua-investing/#comment-78 Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:49:53 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=450#comment-78 […] removal jurisdiction over motions to vacate a foreign arbitral award (I discussed this point in my post on the Ingaseosas v. Aconcagua case, where I contrasted the broad removal provisions of § 205 with the narrower original jurisdiction […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/17/case-of-the-day-ingaseosas-international-v-aconcagua-investing/#comment-77 Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:01:57 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=450#comment-77 […] International Co. v. Aconcagua Investing Ltd. (11th Cir. 2012). We first saw the case way back in February 2011. Here was my description of the facts from the earlier post: Ingaseosas and Aconcagua were both […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/17/case-of-the-day-ingaseosas-international-v-aconcagua-investing/#comment-76 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:22:50 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=450#comment-76 […] Note that there was no jurisdictional issue in this case, as there was in the Ingaseosas case, because here the motion to confirm was filed first, and the motion to vacate was a […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/17/case-of-the-day-ingaseosas-international-v-aconcagua-investing/#comment-75 Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:53:40 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=450#comment-75 […] removal jurisdiction over motions to vacate a foreign arbitral award (I discussed this point in my post on the Ingaseosas v. Aconcagua case, where I contrasted the broad removal provisions of § 205 with the narrower original jurisdiction […]

]]>