<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Altain Khuder LLC v. IMC Mining	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/15/case-of-the-day-altain-khuder-llc-v-imc-mining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/15/case-of-the-day-altain-khuder-llc-v-imc-mining/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:38:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/15/case-of-the-day-altain-khuder-llc-v-imc-mining/#comment-74</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[State of the Blog &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=419#comment-74</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] include the post on the SPEECH Act and recognition of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian decision in the Altain Khuder case, the case of the German investors in Argentine bonds seeking recognition [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] include the post on the SPEECH Act and recognition of foreign defamation judgments; the post on the Australian decision in the Altain Khuder case, the case of the German investors in Argentine bonds seeking recognition [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/02/15/case-of-the-day-altain-khuder-llc-v-imc-mining/#comment-73</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=419#comment-73</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Altain Khuder LLC v. IMC Mining (Victoria Sup. Ct. 2011). This was the Australian application for recognition and enforcement of a Mongolian arbitral award, where the court held that the prior proceedings in Mongolia to &#8220;verify&#8221; the award estopped the defendant to challenge the award in Australia. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Altain Khuder LLC v. IMC Mining (Victoria Sup. Ct. 2011). This was the Australian application for recognition and enforcement of a Mongolian arbitral award, where the court held that the prior proceedings in Mongolia to &#8220;verify&#8221; the award estopped the defendant to challenge the award in Australia. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
