https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/31/case-of-the-day-intercontinental-industries-corp-v-luo/ The Blog of International Judicial Assistance Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:45:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/31/case-of-the-day-intercontinental-industries-corp-v-luo/#comment-24167 Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:09:12 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=224#comment-24167 […] could have avoided this result if it had been willing to do what China did in the Luo case, namely, send back a certificate stating that its Central Authority refused to execute the […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/31/case-of-the-day-intercontinental-industries-corp-v-luo/#comment-63 Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:04:37 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=224#comment-63 […] could have avoided this result if it had been willing to do what China did in the Luo case, namely, send back a certificate stating that its Central Authority refused to execute the […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/31/case-of-the-day-intercontinental-industries-corp-v-luo/#comment-62 Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:58:11 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=224#comment-62 […] exist, of the Volkswagen rule. Such cases could also present due process concerns, as we saw in the Luo […]

]]> https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/31/case-of-the-day-intercontinental-industries-corp-v-luo/#comment-61 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:23:32 +0000 http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=224#comment-61 Russell Beck has a good post at his Fair Competition Law blog about trade secret protection vis-a-vis China. It seems to me that his point about the risks of trade secret theft emphasizes the importance of considering arbitration agreements, as I discussed in this post.

]]>