<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gary Born on In re Caratube	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 18:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Application of Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/#comment-23340</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Application of Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 18:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=191#comment-23340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] is one of the factors relevant to a US court&#8217;s Intel analysis, and because, as Gary Born points out, the tribunal can act as a gatekeeper, the second of these reasons is relatively weak. The trend in [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is one of the factors relevant to a US court&#8217;s Intel analysis, and because, as Gary Born points out, the tribunal can act as a gatekeeper, the second of these reasons is relatively weak. The trend in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Application of Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/#comment-57</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Application of Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=191#comment-57</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] is one of the factors relevant to a US court&#8217;s Intel analysis, and because, as Gary Born points out, the tribunal can act as a gatekeeper, the second of these reasons is relatively weak. The first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is one of the factors relevant to a US court&#8217;s Intel analysis, and because, as Gary Born points out, the tribunal can act as a gatekeeper, the second of these reasons is relatively weak. The first [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/#comment-56</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: In re Application of the Republic of Ecuador &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=191#comment-56</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] is really aimed at the correct construction of Art. 3.9 in private arbitrations). As I wrote in my post on Gary Born&#8217;s take on In re Caratube and in an earlier post on arbitral tribunals as &#8220;tribunals&#8221; for purposes of 28 U.S.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is really aimed at the correct construction of Art. 3.9 in private arbitrations). As I wrote in my post on Gary Born&#8217;s take on In re Caratube and in an earlier post on arbitral tribunals as &#8220;tribunals&#8221; for purposes of 28 U.S.C. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Article of the Day: Beale, Lugar, and Schwarz on the Judicial Assistance Statute and Arbitration « Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/#comment-55</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Article of the Day: Beale, Lugar, and Schwarz on the Judicial Assistance Statute and Arbitration « Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=191#comment-55</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] was precisely to keep the floodgates closed, or mostly closed. I made this point in my post on Gary Born’s take on In re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was precisely to keep the floodgates closed, or mostly closed. I made this point in my post on Gary Born’s take on In re [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gustavo Lamelas on the Judicial Assistance Statute &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/27/gary-born-on-in-re-caratube/#comment-54</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gustavo Lamelas on the Judicial Assistance Statute &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=191#comment-54</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] discovery when we do not do so for parties in domestic arbitrations (but note that Gary Born proposes another solution to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] discovery when we do not do so for parties in domestic arbitrations (but note that Gary Born proposes another solution to the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
