Comments on: Case of the Day: Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc.

By: Section 1782 and Private Arbitration: An Update | Letters Blogatory

Section 1782 and Private Arbitration: An Update | Letters Blogatory — Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:33:53 +0000

[…] tribunal,” as district judges are authorized to do by 28 U.S.C. § 1782; see, e.g., Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc., 633 F.3d 591, 593 (7th Cir. 2011). The German panel conducting the arbitration between GEA and Flex-N-Gate might be considered such a […]

By: Case of the Day: In re Application of Biomet Orthopaedics | Letters Blogatory | Letters Blogatory

Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:02:26 +0000

[…] 2018). It’s an outgrowth of one of the first cases I ever wrote about on Letters Blogatory, Heraeus Kulzer, GmbH v. Biomet, Inc., 633 F.3d 591 (7th Cir. 2011). Time flies. Here was my brief description of the earlier case from […]

By: Ted Folkman

Ted Folkman — Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:46:30 +0000

The federal court in Philadelphia recently granted another application for judicial assistance by Heraeus. The decision is here.

By: Heraeus Kulzer Revisited « Letters Blogatory

Heraeus Kulzer Revisited « Letters Blogatory — Thu, 12 May 2011 11:26:29 +0000

[…] with an interesting take on Heraeus Kulzer GmbH v. Biomet, Inc. (7th Cir. 2011), a case we covered here back in January. In Heraeus, the court held that the district court had abused its discretion by […]

By: Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 « Letters Blogatory

Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 « Letters Blogatory — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:13:00 +0000

[…] Heraeus Kulzer GmbH v. BioMet, Inc. (7th Cir. 2011). This was the Seventh Circuit case in which Judge Posner approved a German plaintiff’s request for judicial assistance in a case involving theft of trade secrets. […]