<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pre-hearing discovery in arbitration: Beck&#8217;s Superior revisited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/19/pre-hearing-discovery-in-arbitration-becks-superior-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/19/pre-hearing-discovery-in-arbitration-becks-superior-revisited/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Servotronics v. Rolls-Royce &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/19/pre-hearing-discovery-in-arbitration-becks-superior-revisited/#comment-22104</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Servotronics v. Rolls-Royce &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=115#comment-22104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] way in &#167; 1782. The court also focused on avoiding a conflict with the FAA that I identified in one of the very first Letters Blogatory posts ever, nearly ten years ago: it is anomalous that parties to an international arbitration should have [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] way in &sect; 1782. The court also focused on avoiding a conflict with the FAA that I identified in one of the very first Letters Blogatory posts ever, nearly ten years ago: it is anomalous that parties to an international arbitration should have [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: ZF Automotive v. Luxshare - Folkman LLC		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/19/pre-hearing-discovery-in-arbitration-becks-superior-revisited/#comment-30</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: ZF Automotive v. Luxshare - Folkman LLC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 10:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=115#comment-30</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] been interested in this issue for a long time. One of the very first Letters Blogatory posts, from January 2011, addressed it. That post focused on whether it made sense for parties to foreign [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] been interested in this issue for a long time. One of the very first Letters Blogatory posts, from January 2011, addressed it. That post focused on whether it made sense for parties to foreign [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
