<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Case of the Day: Bluemedia, Inc. v. Sordid Ones BV	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/</link>
	<description>The Blog of International Judicial Assistance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Netezza Corp. v. Intelligent Integration Systems &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-24184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Netezza Corp. v. Intelligent Integration Systems &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-24184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] IBM had a major laboratory and other  facilities in Massachusetts. IIS&#8217;s process server attempted to serve the subpoena by hand at IBM&#8217;s laboratory. IBM&#8217;s response was somewhat more genteel than the response of the Dutch adult entertainment business in January 10&#8217;s case of the day: [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] IBM had a major laboratory and other  facilities in Massachusetts. IIS&#8217;s process server attempted to serve the subpoena by hand at IBM&#8217;s laboratory. IBM&#8217;s response was somewhat more genteel than the response of the Dutch adult entertainment business in January 10&#8217;s case of the day: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Fraserside IP LLC v. Youngtek Solutions Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-24163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Fraserside IP LLC v. Youngtek Solutions Ltd. &#124; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-24163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] entertainment&#8221; industry on the internet would yield so many cases of the day (e.g., BluMedia v. Sordid Ones and Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan) [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] entertainment&#8221; industry on the internet would yield so many cases of the day (e.g., BluMedia v. Sordid Ones and Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Fraserside IP LLC v. Youngtek Solutions Ltd. &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-7</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Fraserside IP LLC v. Youngtek Solutions Ltd. &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-7</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] entertainment&#8221; industry on the internet would yield so many cases of the day (e.g., BluMedia v. Sordid Ones and Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] entertainment&#8221; industry on the internet would yield so many cases of the day (e.g., BluMedia v. Sordid Ones and Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-6</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greatest Hits: January to April 2011 &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-6</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] BlueMedia, Inc. v. Sordid Ones BV (D. Colo. 2011). This was the trademark dispute between two &#8220;adult entertainment&#8221; firms where the court denied a motion for leave to serve the Dutch defendant with process by email. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BlueMedia, Inc. v. Sordid Ones BV (D. Colo. 2011). This was the trademark dispute between two &#8220;adult entertainment&#8221; firms where the court denied a motion for leave to serve the Dutch defendant with process by email. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-5</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Playboy Enterprises v. Smartitan &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-5</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] use on clothing and women&#8217;s bags to be sold in Japan, which makes the case less sordid than BluMedia v. Sordid Ones, the case we reviewed in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] use on clothing and women&#8217;s bags to be sold in Japan, which makes the case less sordid than BluMedia v. Sordid Ones, the case we reviewed in [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Case of the Day: Netezza Corp. v. Intelligent Integration Systems &#171; Letters Blogatory		</title>
		<link>https://lettersblogatory.com/2011/01/10/case-of-the-day-bluemedia-inc-v-sordid-ones-bv/#comment-4</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Case of the Day: Netezza Corp. v. Intelligent Integration Systems &#171; Letters Blogatory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lettersblogatory.com/?p=14#comment-4</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] more genteel than the response of the Dutch adult entertainment business in January 10&#8242;s case of the day:  IBM security and reception staff refused to accept the subpoena documents Cronin attempted to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] more genteel than the response of the Dutch adult entertainment business in January 10&#8242;s case of the day:  IBM security and reception staff refused to accept the subpoena documents Cronin attempted to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
